Print View
Structured vs. Developmental Curriculum
 

Structured Curriculum

Developmental Curriculum

Coverage

It is comprehensive

It is in-depth with a possiblitity of gaps

It is planned

It is timely

It is predictable

It is relatively unpredictable

Deliberate effort is required for integration within the field

The content flows

It may or may not account for student prior knowledge and/or immediate interest

Student prior knowledge and/or immediate interests are considered relevant

Content

Boundaries are set

Boundaries are open

Theory is logically developed

Theory is piecemeal

Student understanding and retention are primarily cognitively-based

Student understanding and retention are experientially and cognitively-based

It is course related

It is problem and issues related

Educator

Can limit teaching to what he/she knows

May require outside expertise

Can a directive leader

Is concerned with enabling leadership

Process

It is teacher dominated and relies on cooperation

It is collegial and relies heavily on student initiative

A contract is predetermined

A contract is negotiated

There is variable student participation

There is strong student participation

Conformity is frequently the norm

Risk taking is positively reinforced

Motivation is most likely extrinsic

Motivation is more likely intrinsic

Teaching/Learning are primarily deductive

Teaching/Learning are primarily inductive

 Revised and adapted from "Student Centered Teaching", Journal of Education for Social Work, Fall 1976